OK, the boulder is kinda a flux for GMs, if you notice some GMs and some host say, being on the boudler is giving consent, other say being on the boulder is not giving consent, GMS and GH, should be on one page about the boulder, i was on the boulder, moxxa gave consent, GMs should really read logs before making a choice. reg
Ok about the boulder
>OK, the boulder is kinda a flux for GMs, if you notice some GMs and some host say, being on the boudler is giving consent, other say being on the boulder is not giving consent, GMS and GH, should be on one page about the boulder, i was on the boulder, moxxa gave consent, GMs should really read logs before making a choice.
Hosts don't make POLICY, nor do GMs or even SGM's.
POLICY is top down. POLICY is in effect in every room in the game, with the exception of some modifcations for being in a CLOSED and LOCKED room.
All warnings given must be directly viewed. Nothing second hand.
Khaladon reg
Hosts don't make POLICY, nor do GMs or even SGM's.
POLICY is top down. POLICY is in effect in every room in the game, with the exception of some modifcations for being in a CLOSED and LOCKED room.
All warnings given must be directly viewed. Nothing second hand.
Khaladon[/B][/QUOTE]
Then Why do some GMs and some GHs state being at the boulder is consenting to PVP, while others say its not, you guys need to get on the same page about it, and not give peopel mixed answers, because if one Gm tells me being on the boulder is giving consent, and i go kill someone on the boulder, and the GM says that person i killed didnt give me consent. and get locked out, even tho the Gm before hand told me otherwise, just have the same answers, not mixed ones
reg
::waits patiently for a straight answer::
'lood
"look ma, danny's face is turning blue!..."
reg
quote:
Originally posted by kelood:
::waits patiently for a straight answer::'lood
"look ma, danny's face is turning blue!..."
Don't hold your breath and even if you get one from a SGM doesn't mean anything at all.
Isn't it sinking in yet folks?
Hiway
reg
You're correct, Hiway.
Inconsistency is just one of the reasons people should think long and hard about visiting the boulder. reg
I don't think he was talking about just the boulder...
------------------
I got no dukes. reg
Match Point Fralcon.
Hiway - having a ball in Dark Age of Camelot. reg
<<Hosts don't make POLICY, nor do GMs or even SGM's.
POLICY is top down. POLICY is in effect in every room in the game, with the exception of some modifcations for being in a CLOSED and LOCKED room.
All warnings given must be directly viewed. Nothing second hand.
Khaladon>>
*********
Now the next thing to do would be to get EVERY GameMaster to say the same thing. I personally know that the above is true, but apparently some other GMs don't. I've heard some of them say more than once on the Simu message boards that just being on the boulder is consenting. I just blew that off because I know half the GMs have their heads up their asses, but a lot of other people will believe it when they hear a GM say something like that, and why shouldn't they? After all, they ARE GameMasters. reg
*reaches over and tries to steal Methais's paper bag with purple smoke*
I'll get you Methais! 
------------------
Caels Onae'Rae
AIM : Lord Caels
Emails:
caels_onaerae@hotmail.com
caels@gsplayers.com reg
Is it not yet obvious to you all? For the most part, GM's are [mean word]. GH's I have no problem with until they get promoted to GM, because GH's know that we know they can't do anything to us, so they try to stay on our relatively good side. Anyway, it's like this. GM's say it's your own risk on the boulder because they don't like you and want to get you in trouble. They also say it's okay to kill someone in your own locked house if you want to and it will not be against POLICY, but if you do, trust me, they'll find a way to screw you, they always do.
-Prince Sortik
[edited a direct flame towards all GMs]
[This message has been edited by edge (edited 11-20-2001).] reg